There has always been a somewhat problematic Intersection of Medicine & Law in our judicial system. The resulting outcome is one where all parties incur exorbitant costs for the dubious right to have access to a wildly uncertain jury award.
Accordingly, the jury trial of a medical malpractice case should be a last resort, not the first option willingly chosen by any party to the dispute. The court of first resort should be no court at all, but rather an alternative dispute resolution, Arbitrated or Mediated by an individual skilled in the art of navigating the intersection of medicine and law.
United ADR will work with you to get you to resolution in a streamlined and cost-effective way and we’ll have effective neutrals by your side to help you navigate the process.
Courts routinely consider medical malpractice cases “complex litigation” and grant extended discovery schedules and jurors have no entry point into the intricacies of medical practice. They don’t know the medicine; the anatomy; or the complexities of interdependent organ systems. With a jury, anything is possible and that is not where you want to be.
Reduce your costs and work towards a resolution you can control, with United ADR.
Specialists: Jim Denlea, Judge Marvin Segal, Jeffrey T. Miller
There has always been a somewhat problematic Intersection of Medicine & Law in our judicial system.
According to a report by the Identity Theft Resource Center, the number of data breaches in the United States reached …
Negotiating the correct Partnership or Investment Agreement is vital to a successful enterprise.
In years past, resolving cases through binding arbitration was a significantly positive influence on reducing litigation costs …
At United, we understand BI / PI Litigation and claims. Our neutrals understand the need to get to a fair resolution in a cost efficient …
United’s staff provides decades of industry experience from all perspectives, schedule a consult with our experts today.
